Betrayal of Christ in the Garden of Gethsemane


Duccio, The Betrayal of Christ in the Garden of Gethsemane, 1308 

By HANA AWAD 

The Majority of Muslims believe that Jesus did not die on the cross, but that God brought Jesus to heaven on the day Jesus was supposed to be crucified. (The Quran clearly states that Jesus and God were two separate entities. Jesus was only a messenger of God, not God himself.) The text in the Quran leaves some unanswered questions, like if Jesus didn’t die on the cross, who did? Muslim scholars have different interpretations and theories about the Quranic text. Peter Albedard’s Inquiry into Divergent Views of Church Fathers, Albedard encourages young readers to research contrasting views. He says, “By collecting contrasting divergent opinions I hope to provoke young readers to push themselves to the limit in search for truth, so that their wits may be sharpened by their investigation” (Abelard). As a Muslim who has not received a completely satisfactory answer on what happened to Jesus, I look to other religions to see different perspectives that can possibly contribute to my own beliefs. In Catholics, unlike Muslims, have agreed upon what happened to Jesus on the day of his death.
In
The Betrayal of Christ in the Garden of Gethsemane, Duccio clearly captures the details and the mood of the Christian story. To the left of the painting, Peter cuts off a slave’s ear. To the right, the apostles run from the scene. In the middle, Judas kisses Jesus’ cheek, and the mob of the Romans stands angrily behind the two, holding their spears and torches. The number of figures and the energy of the painting gives it a claustrophobic and chaotic feel. The ominous dark trees in the background foreshadow betrayal and death. 
In the Bible Story, Judas leads the Roman Guards into the Garden of Gethsemane where he knows he will find Jesus and the apostles. To point Jesus out to the guards, Judas kisses Jesus’ cheek. Jesus offers himself up to the guards as long as the guards set the apostles free. The apostles want to jump into action, asking Jesus if they should fight off the guards with their swords. Before Jesus can respond, Peter wields one of his two swords, cutting off the ear of a slave in anger. Jesus, angered by Peter’s actions, heals the slave’s wound and proclaims, “Return your sword to its place, 
for all those who take up the sword will perish by the sword.” (Even when Jesus is about to get captured, he keeps trying to preach.) Jesus explains to his apostles that without his capture, the scripture would not be fulfilled. The mob begins to bind Jesus and the apostles flee the scene. 



Though I don’t know if I believe the story or not, I do see the similarities between the two religions, in that both religions encourage peace. People do not realize that Islam also preaches peace, understanding, and tolerance. “The true servants of the Gracious One are those who walk upon the earth with humility and when they are addressed by the ignorant ones, their response is, Peace” (Quran 25:63). So I didn’t find the answer to what happened to Jesus, but in reading Catholic stories and comparing them to my own faith, I perhaps found something more meaningful.

 
  • 3:04 PM

Arkwright's Mill at Night

Arkwright's Mill at Night, Joseph Wright, 1782
by ANTHONY MADISON

Arkwright's Mill, owned by Richard Arkwright, was a textile mill in Derbyshire on the River Derwent. It had a water frame that made longer cotton warp threads for a textile loom. This mill was used to build house working spinning machines because it spins four spindles of cotton of threads at a time. This new mill created jobs that helped employ people, which created a new economy. 


The sky reflects on the river next to the mill on the upper half of the painting. The darker colors used on the painting give it a gloomy feeling. It seems like the feeling of having to work long, lonely hours is beaming from the dark border around the mill. In the middle of the dark background, the mill sits in a valley. The mill is brighter than the rest of the painting to show the financial hope it brings to the economy. 

  • 7:00 AM

The Floor Scrapers

Gustave Caillebotte, The Floor Scrapers, 1875
This Impressionist piece contains three workers on their knees working tediously to scrape the floors of a bourgeois apartment. The three shirtless men seem to represent a form of masculinity and strength as they are the workforce behind creating such an extravagant setting, but their hunched poses could be hinting at vulnerability and exhaustion instead. The 19th century was filled with wealthy people attempting to impress their snobby friends with baller houses and fancy clothes, which is cool until you realize that their are other guys doing labor jobs for some terrible pay.

The renovation occurring in the apartment also references the modernization of Paris with new technological developments. The city is getting filled with railroad stations, crowded streets, and luxury apartment buildings.

The costs for all these improvements are the hardships of manual labor. The floor scrapings are curled just like the curled men. The aren't in a comfortable position, and the rich would never understand how complex and difficult it is to create what they desire. That's probably why this painting was first rejected, as people did not enjoy how the bodies were portrayed.
  • 7:00 AM

The Gleaners

Jean-François Millet, The Gleaners, 1857
By NAYOUNG KWON

Also a feature on Animal Crossing game, The Gleaners by Jean François Millet showcases the realistic view of poverty within the society during the industrial time, but also displays a sympathetic view towards poor, low ranked peasants. However, this piece was a way to critique the unfair treatments of female laborers. The day he showcased this painting, it drew many negative comments from the French middle and upper class because it was a reminder that French society was built from the labor of working classes. On top of that, the fact that Millet created this piece in such a huge scale, depicting labor classes ended up making it worse for the public eye. 

Millet painted with oil on canvas and  divided the composition in half. the top half can be seen as a city where its clean and calm with pinkish blue skies. However, the bottom half of the painting, we can see the peasants working in an unlikeable setting. The ladies are set in a triangular composition from right arm of the women with the blue hat connecting to the women with green hat. They are also in the center as a focal point to strictly depict the poor working class within the painting. The colors are set in a neutral tone so that the women seem as if they are blended with the ground. 

  • 7:00 AM

The Third Class Carriage

Honoré Daumier, The Third Class Carriage, 1864
BY CARLY HOFMANN


One recurrent themes of  Honoré Daumier's work, was the impact of industrialization and urbanization on the working class people of Paris. Here, in The Third Class Carriage, his societal commentary turns his attention to new forms of public transport, namely, trains. His interest was not in the vehicles themselves, but instead in the ways in which they reinforced social hierarchy within such modern and allegedly democratic conveyances.

The invention and widespread use of the railroad was but one of the many changes heralded by the Industrial Revolution. The Industrial Revolution shattered societal norms throughout Europe by dramatically redefining the socio-economic standings of many working class citizens. As the factory system and mechanization of tools took over, many working class citizens found themselves forced out of the country-side and into the cities. This may be exact situation of the women in Daumier’s work here. It is quite possible that the subjects of his painting have been forced to abandon their previous jobs as artisans or farmers in the wake of industrialization.

The women in the foreground of the painting represent three generations, almost as if it were the full spectrum of life.  The figures who occupy the wooden bench in the painting's foreground are clearly of the lower class, as indicated by their disheveled and worn appearance. These third class travelers are physically separated from the more affluent passengers behind them, representing their social and economic separation. The third class family also faces away from the rest of the passengers, further emphasizing their isolation and rejection from Parisian society.

The feeling of compression that dominates the background is dispelled by the spaciousness surrounding the figures nearest the picture plane. In contrast to the irritable expressions of the wealthier passengers in the background, the nursing mother, the grandmother, and the sleeping child, who are all bathed in a golden light, seem quite serene. These features may allude to Daumier’s critique of the upper class being emotionally unfulfilled despite their apparent economic success. Daumier may be saying that it is be better to remain impoverished and content than wealthy and miserable. Though the painting is unfinished, it is still obvious that Daumier seeks to capture the plight of the working class by capturing the quiet moments of their everyday lives.
  • 7:00 AM

The Absinthe Drinker

Eduard Manet, The Absinthe Drinker, 1858
By FRANCESCA MAURO

The latter part of the 19th Century brought rapid industrialization to Europe. With the rise of factory manufacturing, the population began to flock towards urban centers to work. Many people resented the moral decline that seemed to accompany the Industrial Revolution. Alcohol seemed in direct contradiction of the strict organization necessary for a successful industrial economy.

The Foundry and Engineering Works of the Royal Overseas Trading Company outlines a set of nineteen rigid rules for factory workers. These rules emphasize policies of intolerance toward drunkenness on the job.


Absinthe became popular in late 19th Century Paris, especially in bohemian artist circles. Colloquially called the "Green Fairy," absinthe became a symbol of social defiance and gained opposition from politicians and social conservatives. The alleged hallucinatory substance was eventually banned in many countries.

The sheer scale of Manet's The Absinthe Drinker forces viewers to see a mundane subject in a heroic pose at a size often reserved for portraits of royalty. The man, who is supposedly modeled after a man named Collardet, wears a dark cloak and top hat. Framed by an empty liquor bottle and a half-filled glass of absinthe, he seems to retreat into the shadows. The crumbling wall and dimly lit scene seems to hint at disorder, immorality, chaos, all of which lie in stark contrast to the period's fascination with order. This painting, with its muted and dusty colors, is the epitome of realism. It offers a glimpse of the disorder that balanced out the suffocating regulation and rote nature of factory life.
  • 7:00 AM

The Apple Pickers

Camille Pissarro, The Apple Pickers, 1884-6
By KAELYN ROSS

Richard R. Brettell, author of Modern Art 1851-1929, depicts Pissarro as a dedicated painter of traditional rural life. However, the author also explains how the artist, an anarchist, differentiates himself in the category of rural depiction because of his use of urban art techniques. Brettell explains the artist as seemingly a perfectionist and possibly insecure because Pissarro painted this three times before finally selling it. I believe that Pissarro excluded the sky from this work to remove the subjects from the natural setting and more so resemble a factory as they hunch over in the heat exhaustedly. 

I agree with Brettell that these women were intended to depict farming innocently despite their sex, which was commonly used simply for lust. One woman pokes the apples with a stick to remove ripe ones, one hunches over to pick them up and arrange them in a basket to transport, and one woman bites an apple to taste test. Brettell does not explain but this work clearly shows the cycle of production to actual profit because the workers must grow, pick, clean, transport, and then sell their products. Brettell explains how most farmers did not only produce food for themselves, but to sell to a market and or individuals for a profit which can be taken from the work because of the worker eating one in the process of preparing to sell. The author gives background in explaining that the artist chose this topic to paint because he admired rural labor and other people were already doing industrial labor. 
  • 7:00 AM

La Gare Saint Lazare

Claude Monet, La Gare Saint Lazare, 1877
By MISSY ROSENTHAL 

Monet's La Gare Saint Lazare epitomizes the Industrial Revolution and the hopes of socio-economic views in the 19th century. Claude Monet illustrates a beaming metropolis of rail and a free market economy, a system economist Adam Smith argued in favor for in the 1700s. Smith advocated for laissez-faire economics, a system free from governmental rule. He firmly believed in the principle of the invisible hand, meaning the market itself will establish its ebbs and flows. As portrayed in Monet's work, Smith felt that industry functioned best with a division of labor, meaning each workers did only one task. This made for a more efficient working environment. 

Monet shows the worker on the railroad and the passerby prospectively. La Gare Saint Lazare can be seen as an visual representation of struggling socio-political ideologies. On the left side of painting trains and industry dominate the canvas, showcasing a desire for industrial success or capitalism, while on the opposite side of the piece people gather longing for equal rights and pay, or the basis of Marxist communism. 

Monet blurs the lines between these world intentionally, not only to create a beautiful work, but to showcases that these two ideologies were rediscovered in the wake of industrialization. Claude Monet masterfully portrays the social, political and economic ideas of Adam Smith and Karl Marx in La Gare Saint Lazare.
  • 7:00 AM

London: Crystal Palace Int.: etching main avenue display areas

George Cruikshank, London: Crystal Palace Int.: etching main avenue display areas, 1850-1

By ELISE FINN

In Friedrich Engels The Condition of the Working Class in England in 1844, he discusses the problems that arise in a growing industrial world. People sacrifice so much of their identity in order to create an ideal. They have to let go of their true selves to fit into this urban world. This loss of uniqueness for conformity distances people from one another.

Engles says that "this isolation of the individual - this narrow-minded egotism - is everywhere the fundamental principle of modern society" (124). The more separate and same you are, the better chance you have of succeeding. The reality is that people have created "the war of all against all" (124). No more are your neighbors your friends, but they are your competition. Those who may still share commonalities have become strangers. This is the way the world works. The city only makes this selfishness worse.

Cruikshank's etching shows commoners at a gathering area, all looking similar and participating in a bland activity. Not only does this show progressing industrialization, but supports Engles observation of sameness as the answer. It shows the wealthier side, the people who have followed the same path. This is the result of how the strong has trampled the weak, a result Engles wrote about. As the world industrializes, the separateness between the rich and poor continues to grow.
  • 7:00 AM

A Bar at the Folies-Bergére

A Bar at the Folies-Bergere, Edouard Manet, 1882
BY JENNY ZHU

A Bar at the Folies-Bergere is considered Manet's last major work. This painting represents one of the most prominent music halls in Paris at the time. We see through the mirror behind the barmaid that the guests (aka the wealthy white people) are enjoying their time, but the expression of the barmaid tells another story. The painting used the mirror to draw a separation between the bourgeoises with the working class, creating an unsettling composition. As prosperous as the place might seem, the music halls were a common place for elites to pick up prostitutes which spark the question of the barmaid's true occupation. She does not have much expression. In fact, she looks very much dead inside to me. Is she worrying what the rest of the night will be like? If you look closely at her reflection in the mirror, you can see that she is talking to a man. What is he there for? Is he there for some unspeakable business trade with this poor barmaid? Or is he only an innocent guest here a drink and a good time?

A Bar at the Folies-Bergere speaks to me as a frustration of separations between social classes and social injustices.  The mirror is almost like a line between reality and a dream. The barmaid is in a hellhole of reality while the others living beyond the mirror are in fancy attire.
  • 7:00 AM