White on White
12:00 AMTo Those Which They Never Turned Another Cheek:
Admiration for Paintings with Major Authority Issues
Curated by Shweta Vadlamani
White on White, Malevich, 1918 |
History
required power. Precedents were set by people who wielded that power. There was
one point of time when people believed that the enthroned were the only ones
who could oppose the forces of society to make a change. I now proceed to write
about the artistic voices who actively refuted that claim.
The Russian government rejected Suprematist art, deeming it fundamental and nothing extraordinary. The movement did not adhere to academic precedents, which caused the government to distress over the mental stability of this art movement.
Malevich’s artworks, though highly reliant on geometric shapes and basic colors, would threaten the authority and the power of the government if political figures could not censor his works. As if to prove their worth, the government infiltrated Malevich’s studio, confiscated his art works, and left him instead with a small black book of “rules with which to paint his art.”
However, the government’s confiscation of this work, as well as the popularity that he gained from quietly tolerating this invasion, allowed his works to gain more fame than they had before governmental confrontation. White on White became a masterpiece in the field of monochromatic philosophies.
Stalin’s attempts to stifle Malevich’s fame offered the Suprematist founder more recognition than ever before.
0 comments